On the record
“I was looking at an enshittified wall of slop. Insanely exaggerated thumbnails, dumb recommendations of the same tired topics, truly terrible idiocracy-grade content.”
“Let's write our own YouTube clone based on whatever videos have been recommended on Hacker News.”
“This takes ~2 hours now. I can breathe again.”
Opinions and predictions (not established facts)
- YouTube's content quality has declined significantly, characterized as 'enshittified'.
- The current YouTube algorithm works well for the median person but not for him.
- A custom YouTube clone can be built quickly using AI to curate content based on community recommendations.
What changed
Andrej Karpathy has launched HackerTube, a personal YouTube clone, as a direct response to his dissatisfaction with the current state of YouTube. He described YouTube as an "enshittified wall of slop" with "insanely exaggerated thumbnails, dumb recommendations of the same tired topics, truly terrible idiocracy-grade content." Karpathy built HackerTube over a Saturday morning using an AI model named Opus 5.5. The tool downloaded and filtered Hacker News comments that recommended YouTube videos, ultimately identifying 6,454 videos recommended between 2007 and 2026 across 150 topics. HackerTube features a YouTube-like UI, uses a 50% thumbnail size, offers custom recommendations without user accounts (storing state in local browser sessions), includes keyboard shortcuts, and allows data export for users to create their own versions. Karpathy stated the entire process took approximately 2 hours.
Why it matters for builders
Karpathy's project showcases a pragmatic approach to building a content platform tailored to a specific user's preferences, bypassing the perceived algorithmic failures of mainstream platforms. The use of AI for filtering and recommendation, combined with a focus on user control and data portability, offers a model for alternative platform development. It addresses the growing sentiment among some users that existing platforms are not serving their needs effectively.
Practical impact
Karpathy's HackerTube is a personal project, not a commercial venture, but it serves as a compelling example of how AI can be used to curate content based on community recommendations rather than engagement metrics alone. Builders concerned with content quality and user experience might find inspiration in its approach to recommendation systems and its emphasis on user agency. The project highlights a potential direction for niche content platforms that prioritize quality and user control.
Caveats and source limits
The HackerTube project is a personal endeavor by Andrej Karpathy and is presented as a solution for his own viewing preferences. The content quality and recommendation effectiveness are subjective and based on Karpathy's criteria and the filtering of Hacker News comments. The AI model Opus 5.5's specific capabilities and limitations in this context are not detailed. The project's scalability and long-term viability as a public platform are not addressed in the source.
Sources
Claim check: 5/5 supported claims - 5 evidence links - 100% avg confidence
- YouTube has become an 'enshittified wall of slop' with exaggerated thumbnails, dumb recommendations, and terrible content.supported - karpathy.bearblog.dev
- HackerTube was built using an AI model named Opus 5.5.supported - karpathy.bearblog.dev
- HackerTube identifies 6,454 YouTube videos recommended by Hacker News comments between 2007-2026 across 150 topics.supported - karpathy.bearblog.dev
- HackerTube offers custom recommendations without user accounts, storing state in local browser sessions.supported - karpathy.bearblog.dev
- The entire HackerTube project took approximately 2 hours to complete.supported - karpathy.bearblog.dev
Caveats
- This is a subjective assessment by the speaker.
- This claim is based on the speaker's process and is not independently verified.
- Single-source caution: verify critical details at the linked source.
Radar score 76/100 - how it was calculated
- Reliability 77: Primary on-record statement
- Freshness 100: Fresh source date
- Novelty 64: New statement by a tracked AI voice
- Technical 51: Structured technical source signals
- Developer 53: Builder relevance source signals
- Ecosystem 70: Tracked AI voice
- Confidence 98: Claims have reliable evidence
Discussion
Loading comments...